An
event I witnessed in my workplace, that seems to remind me of the article, In a Different Voice by Carol Gilligan ,
made me think critically of my own actions. As I read the article I couldn’t
stop thinking about an event that occurred last week while twenty-one second grade
students were under my care, during afterschool hours. We were quietly getting
homework done until I hear one of the boys scream, “This is my pencil!” and
then followed by a cry. As I looked over, Emerald had already snatched the
pencil from Mya who was calmly doing her homework. Besides already snatching
the pencil away and screaming at her, Emerald still kept on yelling and
claiming on reason why that was his pencil and not hers. Mya was just in tears
with his accusation, and it took about three minutes for me to get him outside
the classroom. While he was walking outside he kept talking out loud and to the
class making a clear statement by saying, “This is my pencil and that’s why you’re
crying because you’re a girl and only girls cry like a baby!” Mya was crying hysterical
at this point as I pushed Emerald outside to speak with both of them separately.
As I spoke to them individually, Emerald was still speaking in his defense and
claiming how it was his pencil, and how he didn’t care if we went to my
supervisor because he can prove that it was his and not Mya’s. On the other
hand, when I spoke to Mya she was more concerned about getting in trouble while
still crying about Emerald’s approach towards her. She wanted to talk to
Emerald without the screaming and just be friends again. She was even willing
to get a new pencil for him in order for them to be friends again. At the end
of it all, neither got the pencil or a visit to my supervisor, but instead I
supplied them with my own supplies of pencils.
While
reading In a Different Voice by Carol
Gilligan it made me reflect on this event as a first-hand experience with my
students. The article stated “how females reflect upon the world of
relationship and psychological truths and need for a response.(10)" While males are
more understanding of the logic of justification.(11)" Both male and females have “different
modes of understanding as well as thinking about conflict and choice.(11) This is
clearly shown upon both students’ actions where the male wanted to be understood
through his yelling and felt he had a way to justify his actions. Meanwhile,
the female still wanted to continue being his friend and establish a
relationship, while telling the truth and a response from the male. Both had a
complete different perspective, as well as approach to the situation in our
classroom.
I
personally feel that I have approached the situation as an authority point of
view, rather than their personal views. Reading this article made me understand
what Emerald and Mya were really thinking and trying to approach from the
situation. At that point, when the event had occurred I simply thought Emerald
as rude and Mya as vulnerable for disrupting my quiet homework time over a
pencil. Yet, as I read the article it made me understand why they each took
certain actions, and why I didn’t just have two kids yelling and screaming at
each other. For that reason I’m still unsure if there’s even another way to
approach another one of these encounters? Or if there’s even a possible change
for these certain actions coming at such a young age.
It's great that you included your own perspective here, I too feel that I notice things more often that seem gendered and biased. I think that is a great example to show Gilligan's perspective. I feel that men typically do want to prove their point while women more often want to work through it and come to an overall conclusion in which both parties are satisfied. I know that this is a biased way to think and I am not saying that it is necessarily true for the whole population, but I do agree with Gilligan in her thinking.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree and think Gilligan's work and explanation towards this topic gives great reason to varies actions. Yet, we can't help to act certain ways or view things different. Therefore, Gilligan did a great job explaining why we function the way we do and differently.
DeleteI do agree that Gilligan did a great job in demonstrating how males and females approach situations differently without suggesting that one way is better than the other. I couldn't help but wonder after reading this post, how much of what Gilligan found is inherently found in societies notions of masculinity and femininity? Do Gilligan's findings approve societies notions of masculinity and femininity? What does it even mean to be the perfect male/female in society today? Hmm, this calls for further investigation, to be continued...
ReplyDelete