Since the about the 1950's, many people in the United States fought hard to try and make the country accept people of other races, the blacks in particular. The Brown vs Board of Education case was one of the most famous cases that fought against the segregation that was going on in the United States. The south in particular was very segregated and made up a very large part of the Civil Rights Era. Since then, the United States slowly began to integrate schools and end segregation, trying to make everyone accepting of everyone despite their race or gender. They wanted to integrate after being segregated for a long time and being treated unfairly. Many accomplishments were made through the Civil Rights Movement, but Gary Orfield and Chungmei Lee write about the decline in the effects and policies that the era of the Civil Rights Movement made.
Desegragation of schools was an effort that was fought hard for and it was accomplished slowly. The South, "which was still 98 percent segregated in 1964" became the "most desegregated part of the nation" (402). All these accomplishments of desegregating schools is decreasing and failing now because of a decision that was made by the Supreme Court in 2007. Orfield and Lee write that, "In 2007, the Supreme Court handed down its first major decision on school desegregation in 12 years in the Louisville and Seattle cases" (399). This decision has made all the efforts that many people made years ago, such as Martin Luther King who died while fighting for an equal opportunity for African Americans, come crumbling down and diminish. It takes away all the hard work activists did and it once again segregates people of different races and it also segregates them by class.
Schools that still had plans to be a desegregated school have to change the way they are doing things because of the decision of the federal court. This is placing children such as the blacks and Latinos at a disadvantage because it is often the case that the schools that they are being segregated from the whites from are not at the same level as the schools that have a white majority. The blacks and the Latinos already have an academic gap and the Latinos have a much higher rate of not being successful in attaining higher education. This places these two groups at even more of a disadvantage because they already have a hard time succeeding in school, and placing them in a school where the level of education is not at the same level as the schools where it is majority white makes it even harder to graduate and to want to go on and have a higher level of education. This does not help them succeed so that they can create a better future for themselves and help their group attain better statistics when it comes to education and the job they have as adults because of their education.
Latinos have become the largest minority group in the U.S. They are also "the least successful in higher education attainment" (400). This can cause a problem for the future generations and the country in the future as a whole because Orfield and Lee write that we will no longer have "a white majority in American public schools" after this decade (400). This can cause the economy and the education levels of the country to have a great impact especially if Latinos are being placed into segregated minority schools which are not providing them with an education that will better prepare them for their future. The rate that this is happening has increased since the 90's and many schools have become largely segregated. If the minority groups are are no longer going to be minority groups in the future, the level of education that the have access to should be equal to the level of education that the white majority have access to. This is because they are going to be the future of the country and these groups have to be educated for their future. They have to be able to provide the country, themselves, and their family with great things because of their education they attained in the U.S.
I believe it is wrong and upsetting that this is occurring again in this country. Kids are being placed in segregated minority schools, which are located most of the time in neighborhoods that are of low income and minority groups. They attend those schools and they don't recieve a very high or equal level of education like a white child would because of the teachers and the administration of those schools.It is also upsetting e cause the efforts that so many people made and fought hard for during a long period if time, are no longer recognized or cared about and thing are slowly returning to the way they were. This should be the opposite and people should realize that they have to work together with other groups to make a diverse environment that can work with each other. That brings me to ask, do you think that desegregation should be taken away and have segregation of minority groups come back? What do you feel about the federal court making such a big decision about something that many people suffered from and fought hard to overcome? Are we moving backwards rather than movin toward and improving our way of thinking towards others? I certainly do think we are moving backwards rather than moving foward.
I have to admit that I was really shocked about how segregated these schools are and how we are moving backward as a nation. It made me wonder when schools "redistrict" areas where kids attend schools, that this is unfortunately an intention.
ReplyDeleteThis article was very shocking to me as well. As a parent living in a low-income community with a failing school district, I have struggled with where to enroll my young children for the past three years. I finally found a school I feel comfortable with, but I had to travel outside of my district to find it. I've always felt that the way the education system works is not fair and that it leaves little to no choice for minorities, but I never realized the socially racialized systems in place that make it so. I've never realized that segregation was even a factor in our society these days. However, I do not believe that forced desegregation is necessarily the answer because it can cause tensions and other problems, especially harmful to young children. Sadly, I don't see an easy solution to the problem since class is also heavily involved. The more affluent members of society, live in the more affluent areas and have better schools because of their resources. Another thing affected by class is parent involvement. Parents in low-income communities are less involved in their childrens' school, partly because they need to work long hours to support their families. This greatly impacts the quality of education offered to their children. It is scary to think that the government is ignoring this situation, especially since soon the minorities will be the majority.
ReplyDeleteI think you hit the nail right on the head. I can speak, firsthand, of the difference between schools within different socioeconomic and racial areas. My elementary years were spent in a lower income school district with misguided government funding which resulted in a loss of focus on particular subjects that proved vital when I moved to a slightly wealthier and whiter town. Certainly the lack of involvement by parents and even students (students that HAVE to work) can cause an enormous strain on the flow of education. I think in many cases, education may be regarded as second to surviving, understandably resulting in a decline in grades for certain socioeconomic groups that happen to be black or latino. There are a variety of different solutions from social to at-home that need to be addressed. I imagine finding a passion in education can be a bit difficult, given the emphasis on it can sometimes be directed at different groups.
DeleteIt is very sad and disappointing that this is happening now. Many kids, especially minority has to overcome more in terms on getting a better education. Education should be for everyone no matter the color of skin or background. Everyone deserves good education. Most of white people get better education because they have money. How are the future generations would be if this continues? I believe that the government should focus a bit more on to give good education to those neighborhoods where there are Latino, African Americans and Asians.
ReplyDeleteI found this article to be very shocking and disappointing. It's sad to see the struggle and fights many people in this country went through years ago to desegregate schools be trampled on. The United States definitely seems to be moving backwards. Every child deserves a good education despite their race or background. Trying to put children together based upon their race or class is not allowing diversity amongst them at a young age which causes them to not be comfortable around other groups of people when they are older and ready for the real world.
ReplyDeleteWhat I really enjoyed about this article is that it presents modern schools as a cross-section of the larger and more subtle racial segregation that comes about based on the social structures that cause economic disparities between races in the first place. When schools were first desegretated in the South, this was the removal of an established-by-law institutional racism, but today we see, sadly, that the legacy of this establishment - the effective segregation of neighborhoods as a result of school segregation - is going strong.
ReplyDeleteReading comment:his article definitely brought light to the issue of desegregation in the USA today. There are many unfair advantages for people a certain race. They tend to live in well off neighborhoods, be of wealth, and yet get great support from the government. Schools that reside in poorer neighborhoods tend to be the least funded sometimes even ignored. For instance the idea of redlining represents this thought because oftentimes the neighborhoods effected by it are ones containing blacks, Hispanics, and low income whites.
ReplyDeleteReading comment:his article definitely brought light to the issue of desegregation in the USA today. There are many unfair advantages for people a certain race. They tend to live in well off neighborhoods, be of wealth, and yet get great support from the government. Schools that reside in poorer neighborhoods tend to be the least funded sometimes even ignored. For instance the idea of redlining represents this thought because oftentimes the neighborhoods effected by it are ones containing blacks, Hispanics, and low income whites.
ReplyDeleteThis has always been something of my interest being that I began to notice this myself... This whole time I lived in a rural area not getting the education I needed to prepare me for college but I got a bigger wake up call when I noticed that most of the kids in my HS were not reading at grade level.. and with me I didnt have this issue since my mom made me read at home.. What also opened my eyes is when my english teacher and I in HS worked together to try and open our first Honors and AP course and even my principal told me to my face there was no point for it since most weren't reading at grade level and were dumb anyways... this made me furious. I couldn't believe that he said something like this being the administrator of this school, instead of vouching and helping us with the program he made it nearly in possible that my HS teacher had to get it done though the other school who was base where we were and offered it. Many students get put back with this disadvantage and since most of these public schools are not really funded well kids miss out on special activities and even science courses need for an higher education.
ReplyDelete